Strong’s G3624 · Greek

οἶκος
oîkos

Definition

a dwelling (more or less extensive, literal or figurative); by implication, a family (more or less related, literally or figuratively)

Etymology

of uncertain affinity;

How the KJV renders it

  • home
  • house(-hold)
  • temple

Every distinct English word the King James Version uses to translate this Greek term. The variety shows what readers in English receive across many different surface words — the same underlying word, scattered across the English Bible under different names.

Featured in

Chapter 33 · ~15 min read What a Household Was the social unit the New Testament keeps assuming Read the chapter →

What the first audience heard

When the New Testament says that Lydia “and the members of her household were baptized,” or greets “the church that meets at their house,” or tells an overseer he must first manage “his own family” well, the Greek word doing the work in each case is οἶκος (oikos). Modern readers hear household and picture something like their own family — a couple, a few children, maybe a guest room. But oikos named an institution that has no clean English equivalent, and missing it scrambles a large stretch of the New Testament’s domestic vocabulary.

The oikos was not the nuclear family. It was an extended, multi-generational economic and social unit: the male head, his wife and children, sometimes his parents or married siblings, and on top of all that a complement of slaves, freedmen who remained tied to the house by ongoing obligation, clients who traded loyalty for protection, and sometimes apprentices, hired workers, and tenants. It was bound together by a single legal head and organized around common production and common identity. Family is too narrow for it; estate too aristocratic. The oikos was kin and labor force at once — the slave who washed your feet at night might keep your accounts by day, because the line between household and workforce simply didn’t exist as a modern category.

Three things follow once the institution is in view. First, the oikos was an economic engine. The workshop or farm or trade was inside it or attached to it — Lydia’s house included the infrastructure of her dye business. Second, it had a head with real legal authority over everyone under his roof. Third, when the household head converted, the whole unit moved with him, because the oikos was a unit; that’s why Lydia’s entire household is baptized together, no husband or children even named.

This is also why the earliest churches met where they did. “The church that meets at your house” was not a small-group Bible study in a living room. It was a congregation gathered inside someone’s oikos — reclining in the dining room, spilling into the courtyard, free Christians and enslaved Christians at the same table while a letter from Paul was read aloud. The host was the head of that household, often a woman: Lydia, Nympha, Priscilla. The architecture of the Roman house shaped how the first Christians ate, prayed, and remembered Jesus for two centuries.

So when the apostles wrote household codes addressing wives, children, and slaves, they weren’t legislating for the modern family. They were intervening in a specific kind of room with specific people in it — and quietly rewiring it from within, demoting the head to a fellow servant and promoting the slave to a brother. To recover oikos is to recover the room the New Testament’s domestic words assume: the place where, for the first Christians, the household and the church were the same thing.

Related words